|
|
|||||||
| TruckZ.com | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Radio and TV | Casino | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
NPI Analysis: Abolish Affirmative Action
NPI Analysis: Abolish Affirmative Action
Repeal Executive Order 11246: “Unnecessary burden of direct and indirect costs to taxpayers; undercuts merit-based employment practices.” MCLEAN, VIRGINIA — In a review of “affirmative action” policies, researcher and statistician Edwin Rubenstein declares that a rollback of race and gender preferences “may be one of the most efficient pro-growth policies available to the federal government.” In an NPI Analysis paper entitled “Affirmative Action and the Costs of ‘Diversity’: Racial Preferences Thrive Under Bush Administration” (#100; published by the National Policy Institute and available at its website, WWW.NATIONALPOLICYINSTITUTE.ORG), the author explains that affirmative action programs: • put a cloud over minority workers who have advanced because of their innate ability. • reduce incentives of both groups to perform at their best— the preferred because they don’t have to, the non-preferred because extra effort seems futile. • increase incentives to hire illegal immigrants who cannot sue for alleged EEOC violations. • force employers to spend billions on compliance instead of productive investments, thereby reducing employment opportunities for all groups. The author points out that raw political power is fueling the affirmative action agenda: Reverse discrimination is the law of the land. To affirmative action ideologues, however, it’s “pay back” time, when white American males must atone for their alleged economic advantages—even if they grew up poor. “White males are the only growth area for the modern victim movement,” says John Leo, a contributing editor at U.S. News and World Report. “Everybody else is covered.’” In typical Washington style, a program designed to aid ‘disadvantaged minorities’ metastasizes into a near-universal entitlement. Is there a method to this madness? You bet: By casting a wide affirmative action net the federal government has vastly increased political support for such programs. FOR RELEASE: Friday, September 30, 2005 CONTACT: Peter B. Gemma, Media Director 703-442-0558 pbg@nationalpolicyinstitute.org http://nationalpolicyinstitute.org/p...tiveaction.pdf |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|